When my wife was pregnant we knew the vaccine issue was coming our way and we put it off as long as possible. As the day fast approached, I started to investigate and compile some information for my wife because she trusted that I would make sure she understood what the main issues were regarding vaccination. We had heard vaccinations were potentially dangerous but we didn’t know if that applied to all children or just some. We weren’t aware if vaccination was beneficial for some babies and maybe not for others. We were new to being parents and we didn’t want to make any mistakes. We certainly didn’t want our baby getting sick if we could do something about it proactively. We wanted our baby to have the most comfortable journey through life possible and if that meant giving our new born vaccines, so she could avoid disease now and in the future, then that’s what we were going to do. After researching for a couple of days, we were more than shocked at what we were uncovering.
1. Vaccines Have Never Been Confirmed To Increase Immunity or Resistance To Disease – this fact baffled us and how could it not? We were completely shocked at this discovery, within a research period that had us reeling from one perplexing discovery after another, regarding what we thought we knew about about vaccinations. Vaccines are advertised to be safe and effective at preventing disease but the only standard that vaccines are held to during their testing trials is if the vaccine injection primes the metabolism to produces antibodies in the vaccinated research subjects. Vaccines are deemed successful ONLY when they promote antibody production in the blood stream, specific to the vaccine material that was injected but we found out there’s one big problem. The presence of antibodies doesn’t mean a person is immune to disease because we have several occurrences and research that indicates that vaccination doesn’t produce antibodies each and every time. There is also lots of ignored research that indicates antibodies produced through unnatural means (like vaccination) DO NOT equate to increased immunity or resistance to disease. Such research can be found here to start. In vaccine research the test subjects are not followed into the real world to see if they get sick or not, yet the vaccine is deemed successful anyway when antibodies are produced even though antibody production doesn’t mean increased immunity or resistance to disease. It’s only a theory and an untested one at that plus a theory is only valid in science until an exception to that theory is found. If only one exception is found, the proposed theory is no longer valid and there are many exceptions to the antibody production = increased immunity theory. These are the vaccines they wanted our daughter to take, 24 in the first year of life within Canada, 26 in the US.
2. Vaccine Manufacturers Refuse To Conduct Any Research To Prove Vaccines Increase Resistance to Disease or Immunity and The Government OKs This Entire Process – so after we learned that vaccines were never proven to make a person more immune to disease in the real world (because vaccine research only tests antibody response, which doesn’t relate to increased immunity), we asked why this research isn’t being done. At that point we discovered that the government themselves along with both science and medicine all block this research from being done because they deem such research unethical. “Come again?“, said myself and my wife, as the contradictions in logic started to pile skyward. How is injecting unproven vaccines into my child considered ethical yet testing if those vaccines really improve immunity or resistance to disease…unethical? At that point, we didn’t understand the entire vaccine debate but we clearly understood that something wasn’t adding up with what was being said verbally and what research was being conducted or being blocked behind the scenes. In this video the top US government official for vaccination admits inside a Congressional Hearing that there is no research between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, to prove vaccinated groups are more immune or more resistant to disease. So as my wife and I would repeatedly hear from government medical officials that vaccines were safe and effective, we always asked that official “Compared to what?…safe and effective compared to what other factor?“, given there are no comparative studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations? In most cases the doctor had no answer and ended up with a complete look of bewilderment on their face that such research wasn’t conducted because they assumed it was………..but they were wrong and they never bothered to look themselves. That of course was shocking all on its’ own, that the doctor pushing the vaccines as “safe and effective” didn’t know this. Vaccinating parents should also be aware that it’s very obvious there’s no follow up calls, surveys or questionnaires after their child is vaccinated, to document the health of the child in general or the diseases the child obtains in their early years of life. This should raise many red flags for any parent believing that there’s no way to safely study if vaccines are effective or not.
3. Babies Don’t Have Fully Developed Immune Systems Until 1-4 Years After Birth – infants do not have fully developed (or even close to developed) immune systems until between 1-4 years of age, depending on what research is being reviewed. Regardless, all research is firm that no fully active immune system is available inside an infant less than 1 year of age. When we asked our doctor why vaccines were required for newborns, our doctor responded that vaccines were used to increase function of the immune system to help with greater disease resistance. I asked, “how can a vaccine stimulate an infant’s immune system when no immune system is fully present to stimulate?” There was no answer from the doctor, so not only was very little making sense, it was quite clear that the doctor wasn’t used to fielding logical questions about vaccination from her patients. After only a couple of questions, it was more than obvious that we were being lied to, whether our doctor knew she was lying to us or not. Just how much we were being lied to, we only found out later, but such blatant contradictions got our guard up immediately. If there’s no fully formed immune system in an infant under one year of age, why are 1 year old infants recommended 26 vaccines in the US and 24 in Canada? Why is the vaccine schedule most heavily weighted in the first year when 1) there’s no fully formed immune system available to stimulate 2) no research follows infants after vaccination to see if they are more immune to disease in the months or years after vaccination and 3) antibody production doesn’t equal immunity anyway. It was becoming obvious to us why so many were having issues with the pro vaccine science, which was turning out to be more belief and blind faith than anything else.
4. Infants Acquire Immunity Boosts from Their Mother’s Breast Milk – this is proven of course, that an infant acquires boosts of their immune system from their mothers breast milk, inheriting the immune strength found in the mother. This may not seem like a completely relevant point but it certainly struck me as odd that there was very little breast feeding promotion coming from the medical institutions, the government or science in general………..in comparison to the tsunami of vaccine propaganda we were drowning in. If a child’s health and immunity were the #1 priority of this “health system” and breast milk was proven to be a major factor for an infant’s immune strength, why was there so much pressure to vaccinate and very little pressure in comparison to breast feed, let alone any pressure on the mother to eat properly, to ensure her immune based chemistry was at peak levels before it was transferred over to the infant? There was too much vaccine promotion (which is unproven lets not forget) and too little in other areas regarding care of the infant. To claim care of a child’s health but to only push unproven vaccination mythology, within the system, really started to bring things together for us as new parents.
5. We Actually Read A Vaccine Insert – under the international medical law of informed consent, each patient exposed to a procedure that could kill or permanently injure them, must be given the related documents legally warning of that risk. We weren’t even aware at the time that each vaccine insert legally declares that each and every vaccine can either kill our child (directly or indirectly) or that our new born daughter could be crippled for life from the vaccine, which has never been proven to increase immunity in the real world. We also must remember that government, medicine and science block the research that would clarify if vaccinated people are actually more immune to disease compared to non vaccinated people. So no research exists to prove if the vaccine will increase immunity or resistance to disease in my daughter plus the vaccine is legally documented to have the potential to kill or permanently injure my daughter. This decision was becoming clear for my wife and I, as we were both more than a little shocked at what we were discovering. In the end we had to ask for the vaccine insert and that request was delayed as much as possible. When we received a vaccine insert it was more than obvious why the international medical law of informed consent was being broken in regards to providing one. If all parents were forced to read one of these inserts, very few would move ahead with vaccination of themselves or their children. Basically, we were now stepping out of discovering that vaccination was unscientific, immoral and unethical but we were also stepping into an area where not forwarding the vaccine insert was in contravention of a well documented international medical law. Click here to read the vaccine inserts of the vaccines you may be considering.
6. A Blatant Disregard for the Most Basic of Scientific Protocol – it was beyond obvious that pro vaccine science was flying in the face of the most basic and most accepted conventional scientific protocols. For example, in high school we all learned the scientific method. The scientific method revolves around forming a hypothesis and then testing that hypothesis. Pro vaccine science proposes the hypothesis that vaccinating increases someone’s immunity and resistance to disease compared to doing nothing. (not taking the vaccine) There’s only problem though. As stated earlier, that research has never been done. How does this pass as science where I’m supposed to inject my child with an untested vaccine that comes with the side effects death and/or permanent injury? I guess it can pass as science when you don’t question your role as patient and your commands from the top of the government or science pyramid but where I’m originally from, that sort of behavior gets you into a whole wack of trouble. As a kid from a rough neighborhood, where the people in power were caught regularly abusing children, I got used to questioning things… especially when government and authority were involved. Science is also supposed to be an unbiased quest for truth but all the negative data on vaccines is being ignored by everyone selling or pushing the vaccines and the appropriate research that should have been done decades ago, is being blocked for reasons that sound official but make little sense. Would it be so hard to study the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated for disease incidence, when people walk in sick every day to hospitals around the world? If someone has the flu at a hospital, how hard would it be to ask, “Did you get the flu shot this year?” Are we really to believe that this sort of research can’t be done? I know nurses and they have told me that when there’s a flu out break declared at the hospital it’s well known that every single person in that hospital who has the flu, has taken their flu shot in that current year. Also regarding pro vaccine research, which takes longer to read over in its’ entirety, the companies conducting the research always were vaccine makers and the government never questioned or reviewed their findings. Claims of research involving “unvaccinated control groups” often documented that the unvaccinated groups were also injected with highly toxic material. It’s not scientific on any grounds to allow parties with a vested interest in the research outcomes to conduct the research and of course injecting people with known poisons and calling them the “unvaccinated control group” isn’t scientific either. It’s corruption. There were red flags all over the place and when it comes to the health of a child, it was starting to become clear that the public were not being told anywhere near the truth regarding vaccination.
7. Vaccines and Autism – like everything else along the way, the research showed the opposite of what we were being told was true. The amount of evidence that vaccines do cause Autism is massive and I documented most everything I found to show my wife and then moved it into papers that I could share with other parents. Click here to see the evidence I complied regarding vaccinations having a direct link to Autism. What was also odd is that when I talked to doctors about the vaccine and Autism link, they told me it was unproven. I then asked them if Autism was a form of brain damage and they agreed it was. Then I showed them the vaccine insert I carried with me regarding the side effects of the very common MMR vaccine and I circled every side effect that I believed could cause brain damage. I asked the doctor if the side effects I circled could cause brain damage in a vaccinated child, as a direct side effect of vaccination and they admitted yes it could. If a vaccine can cause brain damage and Autism is brain damage, how can vaccines be proven not to cause Autism just because a doctor calls the damage a different name? After very little research it became obvious that no one selling, producing or administering the vaccines wanted anything to do with our logical questions and wanted to hurry us out of the doctor’s office and hurry in the next parent, who would take the vaccinations without question or resistance. The non questioning patient who did exactly as they were told was always welcome. We were not.
8. Medical Doctors and PhD Scientists That Warn About The Dangers of Vaccination – I came across a long list of medical doctors and PhD scientists who openly try to warn the public about the dangers of vaccination regarding the same exact points I reviewed above plus much more. What is also odd is that no doctor I ran into, who was in favor of vaccination, could do anything but verbally declare that vaccines were safe and effective, that vaccines prevent disease, that vaccines were the greatest invention in the history of health care and that vaccines don’t cause Autism. Behind the advertised slogans and catch phrases of conventional vaccine mythology there was no real science to back these claims. So we have people who just utter these magic pro vaccine phrases without scientific validation and then we have this very long list of medical doctors and scientists who take their time to explain exactly how vaccination isn’t safe or effective. So there was the bullying and pressure packed approach of the system that manufacturers, sells and administers the vaccines compared to medical doctors (with nothing to gain and everything to lose) taking their time to explain clearly that the public is being lied to about vaccination, on all levels. I may not know everything about vaccination but I know enough to tell the difference between a self serving bully and someone who truly cares about children. That I know for sure.
9. The Place Where They Give The Most Vaccines To Infants Has The Greatest Rate of Infant Deaths In The World – the United States has the most numerous vaccine schedule before the age of 1 in the world, suggesting 26 separate vaccinations. The US has one of the highest infant mortality rates out of all developed nations…..DESPITE the highest health budget expenditure on the planet. Inside the US is the state of Mississippi, where vaccines are mandatory save very few exemptions, Mississippi has the highest infant mortality rates inside the US. I took statistics in University and although this isn’t conclusive regarding the conclusion that it’s only the vaccines that are killing infants, it definitely means there’s a significant correlation. Taken by itself, these statistics raise a massive red flag. Combine these statistics with everything else I discovered and the big picture comes into focus.
10. Like a Bad Infomercial…………..Wait……….There’s More – there could be an entire book written regarding what I found and none of it is good. ZERO. NOTHING. I documented much of it above but there were many more red flags, contradictions and blatant examples of corruption. This information IS NOT FOR PEOPLE who just want to do as their told, march their child in for their vaccines and get on with their day. This is for the parent who takes things seriously and has the strength to move against the herd when necessary, if their child is going to be safer and healthier for it. Not thinking is easier. Name calling toward someone who doesn’t vaccinate is easier. Doing what you’re told, inside a culture that punishes people for not complying, is easier. Getting dog treats of positive re-enforcement from the people who manufacture, sell and distribute vaccines is easier. The newspaper, the radio and the government verbally declare that all vaccines are safe and effective but a little investigation proves these verbal declarations are in contradiction to the documented research. Do the right thing at the right time, not the right thing at the wrong time. Don’t wait until a child is killed or injured to investigate, as happened to this Hollywood star. Investigate vaccines before the needle is in your infant’s arm because once that material is injected under the skin, there’s no taking it back out.
As an RN and mom who didnt vaccinate, I appreciate your thourough investigation and presentation of the facts. Thank you. Cindy Contreras, RN
This is a really excellent, comprehensive article. Readable, too. Thank you
I too am an RN who did not vaccinate my 6 children the oldest being 40!!! We live in scary times now.. I work in the Newborn Nursery and NICU .. I can’t protect them all but I sure try.. I give my support to those that decline the Hep B. I love to explain why their newborn needs the Hep B i.e having unprotected sex and possibly rolling and getting stuck with a dirty needle .. They quickly check the ” do not give box” …. It’s my co-workers that frustrate me more, but I won’t give up!!! Thanks for doing your research your children will thank you !
Always a pleasure Tracey.
Appreciate your efforts to the moon and back
Always a pleasure DJ.
As a mother of a child who was vaccine injured more than once and eventually was diagnosed with autism, I truly appreciate you researching and speaking up on this matter. Its people like you that make a difference. Its amazing to me that people are willing to hear someone out when they say their child had a bad reaction to medication but as soon as we say our child had a bad reaction to vaccines we are automatically shunned and called out right liars. We once did what we thought was right for our child according to doctors and than the moment our children are injured the doctor wants nothing to do with us. Its disgusting on so many levels. So again I thank you for speaking up and researching and being willing to confront doctors on your findings.
Thank you. I want every one to know this.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/vaccine-week-success-stories-18881034/?no-ist
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056803.htm
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/2/07-040089/en/
http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/healthy-living-vie-saine/immunization-immunisation/children-enfants/fact-fait-eng.php
http://www.livescience.com/45111-national-vaccination-effects.html
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/measles-vaccination/en/
http://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/15/science/732000-american-lives-saved-by-vaccination.html
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=52549#.V0J35eSItLM
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/Global-Development/Vaccine-Delivery
http://iboostimmunity.com/articles/line-proves-vaccines-save-lives
Dan – you’re good at copying and pasting. Good for you. Find me one study where a party other than a vaccine maker conducted a study regarding vaccine effectiveness, where actual real world immunity was studied as opposed to antibody response? Find me one study where the group deemed “the unvaccianted control group” was not injected with a toxic placebo? Dan, you are a slave master’s wet dream, constantly looking for what they told you was true, without doing any research into verifying if it’s true or not. One study, put just one study up that proves vaccines work and I will tear it apart to show you that your belief in vaccines is a reflection of your need for control in a world that provides you little to no control.
Here is an example of your lack of knowledge of immunity in young children. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8545224
How do children make antibodies to measles when they have never gotten the illness? You try and say their “non-fully formed immune system” means they will not react to vaccines, but it is plain false. Just because it isn’t fully formed doesn’t mean it cannot respond to infections. How else would they fight off ANY disease at all? The mother may not have antibodies to all the sicknesses they come in contact with…think about it for yourself please.
So Sigh wants me to look at this study. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8545224 and I suggest everyone look at it.
Do we notice anything? Do we notice that 1) vaccine effectiveness is based on anti body response and not real world immunity 2) the study is conducted by the CDC, the vaccine distribution and promotion arm of the US government and 3) the vaccinated group is not compared to a non vaccinated group in regards to if the vaccinated group is really more immune to disease or not. Are we really to believe that these children can’t be followed for 1 year to see if they get sick or not, compared to a non vaccinated control group. It’s the same story over and over again and that story is 1) antibodies are said to equal immunity, which is not proven because there are massive disease outbreaks in fully vaccinated/fully antibody positive populations 2) there are no true unvaccinated control groups and 3) the studies are funded by people who benefit from a positive result. Sign can’t see the corruption but most everyone else can.
First of all, only a few of the people on that paper were from the CDC. You want to label it as CDC produced because then you believe all of these people have some sort of secret motive. You are wrong. These are individual scientists from around ten different places doing these trials. 1 and 3 are red herrings. The point is you said “children’s immune systems are not developed and implied they cannot fight disease”. This is untrue because they clearly do form antibodies and react to vaccines.
No one said antibody equaled immunity, straw man. 2)This study was not done to compare the two(vax vs non-vax) and the point of the response was to a claim YOU made, which was easily refuted. 3) Again you are shaming independent scientist of whom you have no actual knowledge that they are corrupt in ANY WAY, yet you shame them so you can ignore the data.
So literally you tried to automatically ignore data for corruption you have no evidence of in these scientists. You then went on with multiple red herrings and straw men, none of which addressed your original claim, which I said I was responding to in my original reply. Do you see a pattern here?
I see that you won’t link one study so we can look it over, from within the meta analysis. I know none of the studies include true unvaccinated control groups so it’s up to you to find me one where you think true scientific protocol was used. The pattern is you Sign not forwarding one individual study so we can show everyone what’s happening inside of it.
One line. Little more, but a pretty explanation.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM198405313102201
Double-blind placebo controlled study of the chicken pox vaccine effectiveness.
Two groups followed for 9 months. 39 cases of chicken pox. All cases in the unvaccinated.
ZERO cases in the vaccinated.
Not sure you could have a more clear cut case than this. There are so many of these studies for every single vaccine on the market. Easily accessible. That is why I’m amazed that people keep making these claims that these studies don’t exist.
First of all Tyler, your study is not easily accessible and all you do is offer a review of the study, you don’t offer the study itself. It’s $20 to read the full report and of course I am going to pay that $20 and write a full article for you regarding the study you forwarded as the proof pro vaccine science is truely scientific. The reports that block access until you pay money are the best ones for science corruption, so $20 well spent.
I will show 1) why you’re easily impressed with reviews and not full studies (obviously that’s why you forward study reviews only) and 2) I will show you that the placebo group, the one you say are unvaccinated would have been poisoned with a toxic injection, as is always the case. I will get back to you tomorrow. so one reply at a time. You like to hit in waves for what I believe are obvious reasons. As the public will see, the placebo groups you claim are unvaccinated are poisoned, and there’s a firm reason why pro vaccine science isn’t true to science, in comparing poisoned research subjects to non poisoned.
Here’s your big chance to shoot me down and I will shoot myself down for you, if I am wrong. You like saying double blind, placebo controlled……..but I am more than confident there is more here than is being told in the one paragraph celebration of victory. Lets see what I find. Full report tomorrow. This again is for anyone else following this, not for Tyler because he won’t like what I’ll find. I’ve already found the side effect reports of the test subjects who were vaccinated. Not looking good Tyler.
Hi Jason, What happened after June 4, did you ever read the article and provide a recap.
Do you mean to Tyler’s study he put up?
Jason, nobody is going to willingly volunteer to risk deadly disease infection and it is illegal and unethical to do so. Your tires line is clear visibility of your stupidity in regards to science. Maybe try educating yourself and then try reading the 180 studies done on vaccine safety NOT done by the government or the makers. Also…show how the science is bad. Slamming the tester is another clear sign you don’t get science well enough to,debunk the science. FYI, regurgitating tired cliche’s from anti vaxx sites is not educating yourself
Tim – well you keep vaccinating then because people of high intelligence understand that science is an unbiased search for the truth. There are more studies that vaccines are unsafe and ineffective, and to ignore those and to never discuss those, shows the pro vaccination followers are not scientific. Here are 1000 of those studies. http://vaccine-injury.info/pdf/vaccinepeerreview.pdf No one really cares about you vaccinating, so keep doing it. This page is for people who are smart enough to understand that no science in a lab can make documented poisons in a needle safe for a child via injection. If you want to still live in a world where you take orders and vaccinate, no one on this page cares or will stop you. We know vaccines damage children because they’re proven to damage children but that’s your right as a parent to inject your kids, not mine. You will deal with the consequences of that inside your own family. To declare that we need to listen to science but to declare that the hard science against vaccination needs to be ignored, so people like yourself can feel better about vaccinating their children, is a low IQ and asinine way to conduct oneself on this planet. This page is about rejecting such unintelligent ways to live and moving toward a better future. We know some unintelligent people want to keep vaccinating and we say “best of luck”. Keep on truckin. The vast majority of people not vaccinating are upper to middle class, with post secondary education degrees. We understand the argument from the other side. You will not convince us that injecting poison into children is safe because some order taker in a lab was paid to find that result and wanted to finally get the big house they dreamed of inside the North American illusion of immoral living. Thanks for the update. We get your point. Carry on somewhere else.
Bravo!
Great article! Thank you! We need so much more!
Great article. I’ve copied a lot of your info to use in my fight against for my 14mo (hope you don’t mind)
I wish my partner was as trusting and open as you and your wife are with each other. Unfortunately everything I have placed in front of him has not convinced him. He’s still prepared to take the risk. Sadly this has become the end of us. Im so delighted and find comfort in reading yet again that my decision to keep my baby safe and vaccine free is still the priority choice for me:)
You’re doing what parents should do- protecting your child from harm! Good for you. Sorry to hear about your relationship with the father. If my husband wouldn’t have been able to think for himself and look at all of the facts that I presented him objectively, it would have been the end of us as well. I have 1 fully vaccinated child (for 9 years) and 1 completely unvaccinated child, not even a vitamin k shot. The health differences between these two are astounding… my vaccinated child was and is always sick. Body pain and aches no child should have. Ear infections every 2 weeks for most of her young childhood. She even acquired some of the very diseases she was vaccinated for (which I now say after educating myself on basic science and how vaccines work, DUH…..) My unvaccinated child is extremely healthy. Never one ear infection. Not one disease yet at 5 years old and my daughter had 2 childhood diseases by this age.
Very well written and researched, Thank you so much, I did a complete about face on vaccines. So happy my daughter is not vaccinating my grandchildren. God Bless, will share this with everyone.
Thanks for this well thought out and written article. I’m also a RN who no longer vaccinate. I did vaccinate my oldest 2 partially the first year and regret it. In just two short years between him and my next being born 3 more vaccines had been added to the schedule . I also partially vaccinated her without any of the new ones or the hepatitis B or chicken pox. After discussing this with my husband we started really researching them and decided to stop entirely. We now have 6 kids and the last 4 are vaccine free.
I have to get the flu vaccine every year for work and it makes me so nervous when that time comes around to be injecting that into myself.
Have you done any research on how so many deadly diseases apparently have become eradicated or a significant decrease in cases throughout our world? I don’t believe vaccination was or is the answer to this but what is? Your research also supports my findings as well when My husband and I were deciding to or not to vaccinate our son.
Melinda – if you explore each highlighted link in the article, you will come across the information that confirms vaccination did not eradicate disease but has only increased it. Thank you for reading the article.
Jason, can you give me stats on numbers affected by Polio, before and after immunization was implemented using Salk inactivated polio vaccine in 1955?
Let me answer for you, in the 10 years prior to implementation of (ipv) in 1955, nearly 35,000 children were affected by polio each year, after immunization by 1957, 2500 cases and in 1965 only 67 cases in the USA!
Kurtis as I completely addressed in the article, which you haven’t read, the classification of polio between the years you site was changed, where the paralysis was still occurring and actually increasing but the medical associations forced doctors to call the paralysis a different name so people like yourself would say exactly what you said. Thanks for commenting. Maybe read the article and explore the cited material.
Loved your article, but I’m happy to say it didn’t tell me anything new because I’ve researched so much over the years and I’m 100% in agreement to all you have written 🙂 I have ten children. The first three were born in the early 90’s and are fully vaccinated per the CDC schedule back then. Then I had a four year gap in ages and in those four years I met a few families with children who had autism that began after the MMR shot. Not just one family, but at least 4 or 5 (met them at a place called The Institute for the Achievement of Human Potential in Chapel Hill, PA where we were taking our brain injured daughter for therapy after she was hurt in a car accident) Anyway, while we were there we met other families and their hurt kids. I got to know a few of them closely and learned that their child was normal until their vaccinations, usually after the MMR. So that got me to do researched on vaccinations. A couple years later we had seven more children (not all at once!) all whom are not vaccinated. When you know better, you do better, right? My first three are healthy but they get sick easily. Every bug will take them down. My other seven rarely get sick, and if they do it’s only for a day or two and it’s very mild. They have strong immune systems that were never tampered with. No flu shots here, and we never get the flu. We live in CA where now it’s a law that no child can be in the school system without having ALL of their shots. Can’t even skip one. No exemptions allowed except medical (which is nearly impossible to obtain) and so I guess my kids will have to stay home and be homeschooled and miss out on their right to a FREE public education that my taxes pay for. All for what? Because they are healthy kids? Sorry to go on and on, but I get fired up when I think about it. It’s very unfair. Unconstitutional. Talk about segregation! Anyway, thank you for your article. I’m sure it will help to open the eyes of many parents who are not yet aware of the harm vaccines can do.
My pleasure Katrina.
Brilliant article, based on facts. I was fortunate enough to figure out how toxic vaccines are before my son was born. He is vaccine free and has never been ill… Nothing, not even an ear infection and he will be 3 years old. His immune system is very strong. Thank you for helping to truly save lives. Have you heard about the new discovery of the immune system found in the brain. Yes, fascinating and in my opinion, it shows how little we truly know about the brain. I will provide a link from Science Daily, dated June 1, 2015. Source: The University of Virginia health system.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/06/150601122445.htm
In my opinion, This would definitely shed light on the vaccine/autism/SIDS link if it were researched honestly and thoroughly.
Thank you for fighting the good fight!
Thank you Juarez for protecting a child like a parent is genetically charged to do. To protect the innocent, is to be truly human.
1. What has happened to the incidence of smallpox since the vaccine was introduced? To polio? To measles? To haemophilus influenzae meningitis?
2. Please note the published infant mortality rates by country and accurately represent where you find “the highest infant mortality rates in the world.”
3. It is inaccurate that infants have “no immune system.” They have a still maturing immune system but are able to mount an immune response to infection and to vaccines.
4. There are multiple large scale studies showing no link between autism and vaccines. The “Doctor” who started that debate did so based on a “study” involving < 50 patients and has since lost his license due to unethical behavior.
5. The American Academy of Pediatrics is very diligent at promoting breastfeeding and its many health benefits as well as the importance of vaccinating our children. I can't imagine that many actually believe that this organization doesn't have children's welfare at the top of their priority list. Visit their site.
6. Growing up in a first world country where we have long seen the benefits of decreased disease incidence due to success and advancement of medicine has made people forget what we have and how we got here. Wake Up!
7. The scientists and experts who have made these recommendations got their credentials from many years of study. They didn't just google it or form a case study based on a person whom they know, and then develop an opinion. Expertise has value.
Well maybe you can forward just one article (not a cluster) Tricia, that cemented your decision to vaccinate yourself or your children. Expertise does have value and that’s why the testimony of over 100 medical doctors and PhD scientists were included in the article, who speak AGAINST vaccination. http://bit.ly/1qX8HMV
The incidence of disease decreases, as addressed in many of the article links, has never been proven to be from vaccination, as is discussed here by Dr. Raymond Obomsawain. http://bit.ly/1injLOR
You misquoted the article regarding the infant mortality rates, which is obvious for any who read the article but here’s the proof of what was said, which was “one of the highest” – http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_05.pdf
If you think infants can mount a response to vaccines, please forward us any research that shows infants less than 1 year of age were volunteered for vaccination research.
Please forward us the research that shows vaccines don’t cause Autism so we can discuss what research you’re talking about.
The doctor you talk about didn’t link vaccines to Autism, he linked the MMR vaccine to gut disorders and yes he lost his license so people like yourself would keep vaccinating and of course it worked as designed. I could go on.
Just post for us one study that you think shows all of us that vaccines do what’s advertised. JUST ONE. Please enlighten us.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X14006367
Meta-analysis involving 1.5 million children on 10 different, selected studies. Pay attention to the discussion where they looked at 12 systemic reviews of this top, 11 of which showed the same findings. Autism and vaccines ARE NOT correlated or causal.
Here we go again with Sigh not doing his homework. It’s the same response as every other one this page. Here’s the link he wanted me to look at. https://autismoevaccini.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/vaccines-are-not-associated-with-autism.pdf
We ask Sigh to show us one study inside the meta-analysis where a group of vaccinated subjects were tested against a group of unvaccinated subjects. Real science dictates that if you forward a hypothesis that vaccines don’t cause Autism you need to study vaccinated people and NON VACCINATED. Control groups injected with aluminum or other toxins don’t count as a control group in a true scientific vaccine study. I stake my reputation on Sign not finding one study inside the meta analysis that meet true scientific standards regarding pure unvaccinated control groups.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa021134#t=articleResults
OK so there’s the one link Sigh believes shows that Autism isn’t related to vaccination. That was his big shot at proving that pro-vaccine science is real science but guess what? The proof that this study is completely unscientific is right inside the study itself. If we scroll down to “statistical analysis” we find what we always find in pro vaccination research and that is classic corruption and manipulation. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa021134#t=articleResults
What is the vaccine debate all about anyway? Why are so many people not vaccinating and why are so many protesting? It’s easy to understand if you read the pro vaccine research, just like this one and of course Sigh is very confident he’s pulled a winner from the hat but he hasn’t read the research he’s sent me. Again go down to “statistical analysis” and find this whopper of a statement……. “The children were assigned to the nonvaccinated group until they received the MMR vaccine”
Classic unscientific corruption because the study gives the indication that there is no correlation between the MMR and Autism and the study appears to compare vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, to draw their data but it’s unvaccinated with the MMR vaccine only. Many children in this study would have received many other vaccines and still fell into the unvaccinated control group for this study. Again, unscientific, corrupt and obfuscating to the real data…….and that’s what the big uproar is about folks. When people actually stop and look at the data and research, it doesn’t add up and then of course there’s the piles of vaccine damaged children, which simply confirms the corruption.
First off it was YOU, the anti-vax people who claimed it was MMR that caused autism remember? That is how it all started. So when the research was done that was your claim. Now you have moved the goalposts and said, Oh well than ANY vaccine. Right?
The main problem with your response is you are not sure how many of those kids marked UNVACCINATED had no vaccines at all. They do not mention, it could be all of them remember? But you assume they had others because it fits your false claims. Way to be intellectually dishonest again. Now its time for you to back up anything you say. you claim “piles of vaccine damages children” how many kids are seriously hurt from vaccines each year as you claim? What percentage of vaccines are dangers please link your best one or two studies, thanks.
Actually Sigh it was the government themselves that found that the MMR vaccine increases Autism in children of African American decent and the government scientists were told to destroy that data, so people like you could keep talking to people like me that nothing happened. We know this because a top CDC scientist came forward with the data that proves the MMR causes increases in Autism in some children and causes a steady amount of Autism in all children. This CDC scientist was told to put all that in the garbage but he kept it..
So it wasn’t me manipulating, it’s the people you’re having a passionate science love affair with who are moving the goal posts and hiding the data. So here’s the proof that the people you are siding with are corrupt, hiding data and poisoning children. Not too sure what else you need but feel free to keep your head in the sand and your bum up in the air for what is obviously coming your way. Cheers Sigh. https://sharylattkisson.com/cdc-scientist-we-scheduled-meeting-to-destroy-vaccine-autism-study-documents/
That has been shown to be false. If you are honest with yourself and your community you will read this
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/did-a-high-ranking-whistleblower-really-reveal-that-the-cdc-covered-up-proof-that-vaccines-cause-autism-in-african-american-boys/
Could even read this if you wanted. http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/cdcwhistleblower.asp
Lots of info about how your study is completely false and the changes were most likely just not true. And why is it JUST African American males? Its funny you criticize my data but again add your own which makes ZERO sense. If its vaccines it should be everyone, most of the autistic diagnoses in the world are from white people. How does any of this make sense to you, you are grasping at straws. I want one REAL study. Not a controversial, bullshit claim. Give me a study, they are linked it should be easy right?
https://www.autismspeaks.org/science/science-news/no-mmr-autism-link-large-study-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-kids
Maybe the study linked here? 95,000 children, 15,000 of which were unvaccinated. Then compared with no higher autism rates. Shall I continue?
Sorry wrong again Sigh – what does unvaccinated mean to you? Unvaccinated should mean unvaccinated. In this study unvaccinated means, not yet receiving the MMR only and receiving of other vaccines. Again, unscientific for every reason under the sun. It doesn’t compare vaccinated and truly unvaccinated groups, regarding Autism and parents with vaccine damaged children notice these issues, as do other people who are caring of their children and others. Corruption, manipulation of data and highly manipulative article that takes advantage of people who don’t read the research. Thanks for proving my point twice now. The illusion is cozy and we don’t blame the weak for wanting to live there. This was the study Sign wanted me to look at. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2275444
Jason,
The US does not have “one of the highest” infant mortality rates. Obvious to anyone who looks at the data. Those with better mortality rates are also wealthy and more developed countries. Those with a higher mortality rate have low vaccination rates but also more poverty, war, sanitation, etc. We can compare our 5.7 per 1000 rate to Monaco’s 1.something rate but we could also compare it to numbers in the 50-100 range in Africa and the Middle East. Lack of access to vaccinations is certainly part of the equation for the higher infant mortality rate in these less developed countries but certainly not the whole explanation. Similarly, differences in the socioeconomic makeup of the developed countries in Europe and the Americas account for some of the difference between a rate of 3 and 5.7 per 1000, but I don’t think vaccination status actually is the biggest factor. Vaccine rates I am guessing are pretty similar between the US and the U.K.
Also, yes, Dr Wakefield did conclude in his small fraudulent study that MMR and autism may be linked and thus harmed many families with misinformation.
For an article for the autism issue, I point you to JAMA, April 21, 2015, “Autism Occurence by MMR vaccine status among US children with older siblings with and without autism.”
For a general article regarding the world health benefits of immunizations, I suggest the Bulletin of the World Health Organization’s article, “Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, and inequity world wide.”
I will answer back to Tricia’s response but I only do this for people wanting to understand the inner psychology of someone who absolutely refuses to see what research they asked me to read over, which I did of course. Tricia will keep ignoring and that’s to be expected but it doesn’t mean someone else reading this can’t learn what’s going on here. Saying that, I understand the base motivation of someone who wants to believe in vaccination in contradiction to the research.
First of all, what needs to be said is that someone’s beliefs are what gives them a form of control in their life. The greatest fear a human has is a lack of control. Our beliefs that we know exactly what’s going on in the world, gives us our confidence and reduces our fear. When those beliefs are challenged, an anxiety can form, regarding someone losing what they believe is a foundation of control. Today many people are vaccinating, not because there’s any evidence vaccines do as is advertised, but because it’s about the person themselves and their need to feel in control of their own personal lives. People who vaccinate are doing so for them on a personal level, not for the children and we know this clearly because there’s no evidence vaccination helps children. When someone is vaccinating because of what vaccination does for them on an emotional level, the research doesn’t matter. People who believe exactly as the news, government and radio tell them are great order takers and perform marvelously in the positions they are fitted into by the government, media, science etc. This mental programming provides for a highly productive, highly efficient, non questioning, highly compliant and dedicated follower but that personality doesn’t help on the research side of things and it certainly doesn’t help children who keep getting poisoned, when no data exists to show vaccines improve immunity or resistance to disease. The studies Tricia has forwarded, that I will review, are prime examples of how little people care about what they’re doing to themselves or their children. Lets take this one point at a time.
So yes the US has one of the highest infant mortality rates of developed nations, as was already shown in this link http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_05.pdf and the US has the highest vaccine rates of each nation listed in that link. Inside the US, the state that forces the most infants to be vaccinated has the highest infant mortality rates within the US, as was cited in the article I wrote. As for African infant mortality rates and a claim they could be better if the African population vaccinated the answer is this…………vaccines aren’t proven to increase immunity in individuals so obviously what can’t be proven in individuals, can’t be extrapolated to fit over entire nation states. Tricia won’t be able to forward any scientific research that shows 1) vaccine success is measured on anything but antibody response and not real world immunity and 2) unvaccianted control groups in unscientific studies are injected with toxic placebos, as to avoid true scientific protocol.
Tricia tells me to go to this link regarding Autism not being related to vaccines. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2275444 but there’s one problem and it’s a big one. The study doesn’t comapare vaccinated children to unvaccinated. If your hypothesis is that vaccines aren’t related to vaccines you need to study the vaccinated in comparison to the unvaccinated, which this study and most other studies refuse to do……..and there’s a firm reason for that but who wants the truth and proper scientific research when you are vaccinating for reasons other than the health of the children.
As for the WHO Study Tricia mentions which is here…… http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/2/07-040089/en/ It’s chalked full of 69 seperate studies that either 1) don’t compare vaccinated groups to truly non vaccinated groups or 2) do not follow the research subjects out in the real world to see if those people are immune to disease or not……compared to people not taking the vaccine. So again, it’s the exact same problem an order follower wants to ignore. I ask Tricia again to forward one study out of the 69 within the WHO Report that she believes is a slam dunk for showing vaccines are safe and effective and I will prove it is not for everyone to see. Pick one and lets get at it.
Trisha is correct, you AGAIN do not know how to interpret data. I do love the irony of you using CDC data this time around though!!! It’s good enough when it fits your prerogative eh? Anyway you didn’t read the study you linked either. If you had you would see that the data after that first graph was adapted because the US includes in infant mortality the babies less than 24 weeks while other countries do not. You can see the adjusted data lower down. Also if you see we have the highest rate of preterm births, which as they mention, is also the greatest potential for mortality. Why do we have the most preterm births is another question altogether and if we have to go there we can. Still, once again, you failed to actually analyze studies, you saw a first graph and said “AHA, my position is right” but you failed to look at the real numbers and statistics.
Jason, what is your medical or scientific background?
What is yours? In fact where can we find a picture of yourself so we can see the health you personally carry, which of course must be the result of your immense knowledge of health and science. I say that because in our society we have so many people swearing that they know the truth about health but they don’t have any to show. We shouldn’t take wealth information from the poor and the same philosophy applies in all areas of expertise. Is injecting poison really healthy for people? Lets see someone who does so and lets see what sort of health they carry in general.
I am a physician. And I am in better shape than you are(not that that means anything in regards to knowlegde). Please explain why you ban people when they try to refute your claims?
Then lets do this Sigh – get two patients who are unhealthy in a major way and you can pick them. I will work with one using only food, water, exercise and relaxation and I will do it only through Skype. You take care of the other one. In 6 months lets compare the health on any measure you pre-determine before the competition starts. You don’t know how to make a person healthy and everyone knows that. Your skill is in drugging, cutting and burning. You’re not skilled in anything other than hurting people and this will be easy to prove. I will even pay to make a documentary of both patients. You are a physician, what a joke. I laugh at you if you think you know anything about making a sick person healthy. The bullshit stops Sign when you step out of the illusion and I challenge you to step out into the real world.
Your challenge is inane. I see real medical physicians for my health needs and guess what my primary care physician tells me: eat healthy, exercise, drink plenty of water, and reduce stress and learn to handle it with relaxation. But he also does preventative care: vaccines and cancer screening. So….??????
What do you think medical doctors actually suggest people do???
Name your facebook profile Misty or post a pic, so everyone can see how healthy you are, based on your doctors advice and your knowledge on health. We wear our health so lets take a look.
Jason,
My sons are completely unvaccinated and have rarely been sick however my eldest son (only 22months) has had febrile seizures which doctors say is common and not to worry about, (they also suggested that he should get vaccinated because if he got one of the ‘preventable’ diseases he might have a seizure related to the fever accompanying the illness).
We are a very healthy family who don’t drink, smoke or take any form of medications.
Do you have any insight into why my otherwise completely heathy son is susceptible to febrile seizures? (many people who assume my son is vaccinated said its the vaccines!)
I am sorry about that Michelle. Mercury fillings come to mind but also does the vitamin K shot. Do you have any mercury fillings and was the vitamin K shot given to all the children. Were you vaccinated during pregnancy for the first child? Just some ideas regarding that unfortunate issue.
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the reply.
I had a Mercury filling removed about a year before becoming pregnant, could this still have been in my system and affected my son? (no vitamin k shots were given).
It has been suggested he just has a sensitive nervous system which makes me question why other people would push vaccines on my children that have no medical history because they have just been born and no one is able to tell if they have any medical contraindications let alone will have (or a more susceptible too) an adverse reaction.
Excellent Article Jason! Just one more thought to add to this for parents who think that the ideal thing is to protect your children from all disease. Each challenge that a child comes across naturally has a biological purpose to strengthen that child so he/she can handle life and all of it’s challenges in the future. The first major challenge is entering life through the birth canal. This is a major accomplishment! Next is to get all of it’s needs met through figuring out how to communicate that to it’s care givers.(not an easy task) Most childhood symptoms are mostly misunderstood and treated improperly, thus creating more problems. When a child get’s to the other side of a physical ailment, it not only strengthen’s that child on a physical level, but also a mental/emotional developmental and spiritual level. It’s not only Autism we should be looking at, but all the anxiety disorders and other chronic disorders that young people are experiencing now more than ever before. Nature may seem crude at times, but it is perfect and there for us to understand, not try to control. Human beings are a but arrogant that way. Once one decides that vaccination is not the answer, please don’t stop there….there is much more to understand that will only benefit your children and the world.
Please ask Tricia what exactly are the vaccination rates for the US, by vaccine, for all vaccines. Not just children. For everybody……and please make sure she includes statistics on people who may have been vaccinated when they were younger, of which those vaccines may not be effective anymore.
Sigh isn’t doing too well in this exchange; not surprising. Aside from his focus on MMR/Autism, Sigh ignores the fact that vaccines can and have caused death and life-long serious injuries. If Sigh chooses to take that risk with his/her children (since there is no way of knowing beforehand who is at risk), well (sadly) that is Sigh’s decision to make. But there is NO WAY that any medical procedure should be legally mandated. There is NO WAY (no matter what laws are on the books) that smart, open-minded, forward-thinking, research oriented, unbiased parents are going to vaccinate their children. Sigh, you are on the wrong-side of history on this one.
Defend Big Pharma and the CDC all you want. Remember that this corruption has been going on for decades. For example….
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9mh9f_swine-flu-1976-propaganda_webcam
No one said medical procedures are without risks. Exemptions are made all the time. Two red herrings in the debate. The point in the risk is minute at best. Smaller than almost any procedure we know of, along with the fact it has saved hundreds of millions of people from disease morbidity and mortality. Please find me a study about how many “risky” vaccines actually are. I look forward to the easily found data. Ironic you described me exactly, unforunately YOU are the one who refuses to look at data or research. You ignore all of it that counters your opinion. I have had this argument hundreds of times and know almost every study on both sides. YOU are on the wrong side and the evidence is all over, you just refuse to take it in. Notice how multiple times I have asked Jason for data to back up some of the claims he makes and he has linked ONE review article without actual data just a story about a “whistleblower” who I countered with two separate articles, both linked to studies and data.
And this….
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/merck-created-hit-list-to-destroy-neutralize-or-discredit-dissenting-doctors/
Sorry Sigh. You (and the companies you are shilling for, Big Pharma) have ZERO credibility. This lying/deception/corruption has been going on for DECADES. Are you going to trash the 60 Minutes piece? Do you understand that vaccines have caused death? Brain damage? “Please find me a study about how risky vaccines are.” Really??? Really??? Want to speak to the parents of the vaccine injured? You little pussy.
I never said any of that. Nowhere did I claim they are without injuries, serious or otherwise. You are arguing against straw men again buddy. I asked you to show me HOW DANGEROUS. Because like I said, they have saved HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS from disease morbidity and mortality. If they are as dangerous as you say show me the data. Last chance or I will ignore you for the troll you appear to be.
Funny always the AV group who start the name calling, shill, etc, etc. You guys have to resort to that because you can never produce the data to back up anything you say, its sad really, look at yourself.
Unfortunately, we have no way of knowing how dangerous vaccines may be because the vaccine reporting system is so terribly broken. Under the 1986 law, every medical issue that occurs within a certain time frame following vaccination, regardless of whether the doctor or nurse believes it to be related to the vaccine, MUST be reported to VAERS. But there is no penalty for failing to do so, and the government itself admits that as few as 1% of all vaccine adverse reactions are eve reported. This system was put in place so vaccine reactions could be properly tracked, and clusters of similar event could get further research. This has not happened. How can you possibly claim that vaccine reactions are rare when there is no credible reporting of vaccine reactions? With the recent debate in CA over their new exertion removal, there were thousands of parents of vaccine-injured kids protesting, more protestors than the statehouse had ever seen before. California is a state of 39 million people, so if vaccine reactions are really “one in a million,” we should have seen no more than 39 vaccine-injured kids. You mention that you’re a doctor. Have you ever administered a vaccine? Have you ever reported a temporally-related reaction to VAERS?
Don’t waste your time with that one Jen. Vaccination is a cult religion and there are many overt and covert punishments for leaving any cult. Most are not strong enough to make a break for it.
Sigh….stop ignoring the vaccine injured.
Sigh, isn’t that the problem? Did you unwittingly admit that NO ONE knows how dangerous vaccines are? All we know is that there are studies backed by big pharma that show NOTHING (what a shock; just like big tobacco!), and studies that show otherwise.
And you are IGNORING the thousands and thousands and thousands of vaccine injured. Who trusted their doctors. Who trusted the pharmaceutical companies.
Meanwhile, you are backing an industry that has a history of lying. Want me to give you a few citations of that? I already gave you one. Or maybe you can look up Vioxx. Or OxyContin.
“It’s sad really, look at yourself.”
Dr. Richard Pan is going to wind up being a “hero”, but for the wrong reasons. He woke up a sleeping public.
Dude, your side is losing. Just like tobacco companies. By the way, have they EVER admitted harm?
You are incapable for actually reading and comprehending what has been said, that much is clear. It is no wonder you are anti-vax. You are clueless about how much vaccines have truly helped the world and it shows with every post how you refuse to admit how many people they have helped through prevention of horrible diseases. Once you come to terms with that ask yourself if very rare injuries are worth HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of people saved.
It kind of depends on what you mean by “saved”. This so called “health care system” we have now, has created more unhealthy but yes still breathing human beings. It is getting to the point that we have more unhealthy people than healthy which is such a strain on humanity that the burden is overwhelming us all. The mere lack of understanding nature which is “real science” (not statistical science, which is useless), is ultimately leading us to our own demise.
Is this what we want?
We are being totally undermined by a Medical system run by the pharmaceutical companies. They have the money to advertise and train or entrain everyone to believe that what they do is helping everyone. Are they?
Sorry, but you cannot pin the “unhealthy human beings” on healthcare. Health is a lifestyle choice and has nothing to do with how healthcare functions. Doctors are educating and reeducating people on how to live a healthy lifestyle, the problem is the amount of people willing to take the advice. Vaccines save all people “healthy” or unhealthy. Regardless of what the anti-vax crowd parrots no amount of proper nutrition, excercise, etc etc can save everyone from diseases or cancers or other things maladies. Many of these are a combination of timing and genetics.
Jason, you have misunderstood the first article you linked (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823). They did not all get the measles as you say, less than 1% of them caught it. None of the 1732 students who tested positive for the antibody contracted measles.
Yes Kirsty – you are correct there. It was a poor example of the point I was trying to make. I have used this literature instead as better examples of the false antibody= increased immunity link. http://www.whale.to/vaccines/antibody.html
Great point by point article. I have bookmarked it for later reference when I can get to a printer! It will be nice to have these points at the ready the next time I am quizzed on my reasons for not vaccinating my youngest.
I get tired rather quickly of defending my position, in person but especially online. So many people too quick to jump down your throat and attempt to demean you for your efforts and research. I mean, how DARE YOU not swallow the party line, hook and sinker too?? I wanted to commend you for your patience and diligence with your trolls. I get so frustrated reading thru the comments some days.
Thanks again for your article and links. It is said: An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it. Truth stands, even if there be no public support. It is self sustained.” (Gandhi).
If the government and vaccine makers really think it is in the public’s best interest to mandate vaccination, then they should provide them at no cost as a public service…..after all….the government is paying for the research through grants, but the pharmaceutical companies reap the profits……take the undeserved profit out of the equation …
I guess Sigh decided to go back to collecting his Big Pharma paychecks.
Oh, Sigh.. Was the 60 Minutes story wrong about vaccine fraud….40 years ago?
Sigh, If I am for vaccinating, but at a slower schedule than the CDC recommends, am I anti-vax? If I am for safer vaccines, am I anti-vax? If I am for not mandating vaccines until a test can be devised which would determine who is at risk for vaccine injury, am I anti-vax? If I am for eliminating the liability exemption for the vaccine makers, am I anti-vax?
The schedule has never been proven to mean anything. There have been multiple studies showing as much. If you had any education in immunology and thought about life you would understand why this claim is laughable. See Myth 1 explained here by a doctor:
http://www.parenting.com/article/10-vaccine-myths—busted
“The schedule has never been proven to mean anything.” I LOVE that the pro-poison crowd admitted that!!!! Yes, you are correct…it’s an artificial schedule for which there is ZERO scientific basis for why kids need 74 doses of vaccines….especially when there have been ZERO studies of the cumulative impacts of all of these doses.
So, Sigh, thank you for at least admitting one truth. The schedule has never been proven to mean anything, other than it lines the pockets of Big Pharma and perhaps you.
And I challenge you to talk to the people I know—-thousands and thousands of people—who have vaccine injured kids. Or who have lost kids to vaccines. Stand up and tell them that vaccines are safe. C’mon.
Why aren’t you for safer vaccines? Why aren’t you for finding a test that can be devised to help determine who might be at risk? Why aren’t you for eliminating the liability exemption (if you think vaccines are safe, what does Big Pharma have to worry about?). Why aren’t you admitting that vaccine fraud has been going on for decades?
Oh, we lost Sigh again….
It kind of depends on what you mean by “saved”. This so called “health care system” we have now, has created more unhealthy but yes still breathing human beings. It is getting to the point that we have more unhealthy people than healthy which is such a strain on humanity that the burden is overwhelming us all. The mere lack of understanding nature which is “real science” (not statistical science, which is useless), is ultimately leading us to our own demise.
Is this what we want?
We are being totally undermined by a Medical system run by the pharmaceutical companies. They have the money to advertise and train or entrain everyone to believe that what they do is helping everyone. Are they?
You say that their are no blind scientific studies that prove vaccines are safe. Well, the shoe fits in the other foot too. Where are the same to prove they are unsafe. Good luck with your fear mongering tactics to sell your book(s).
Here’s 1000 of them, all showing vaccine ingredients damage internal organs on a dramatic level. We know you will keep vaccinated Todd and for people like you, we wish you the best of luck. For everyone who may believe there are no studies proving vaccines are ineffective and unsafe, here is 1000. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3mMkPwF1DUPckVEZ2JkMXV2ams/view
Just came across this report from Vaccine Court listing settlements for over 100 vaccine injuries and deaths in just one quarter!
http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/march-2015-settlements-in-vaccine-court-117-vaccine-injuries-and-deaths/
Whether or not mass vaccinations decades ago were responsible for the great reduction in certain disease, the precautionary principle would indicate that there is very little risk of getting eg polio now and therefore every reason not to vaccinate against something your child is unlikely to be infected by, since the vaccines do have risks.
I’ll be back again when Jason responds to some of my queries about data to back up his false claims. See the main problem with anti-vaxxers like Jason here is they only ask questions and move goalposts. A great example is the “vaccines haven’t been tested for autism” which I showed a huge metaanalysis and an additional study of 97,000 children. See when Wakefield first started the resurgence of this mess people like Jason were saying “MMR causes Autism, Wakefield showed us and they quieted him”. Then two large studies come out showing no link to MMR. Then the AV crowd decided to do the despicable thing and move the goalposts. Now he wants a study of completely vaccinated VS unvaccinated, although given in the two largest studies of the metaanalysis it doesn’t say how many of the unvaccinated group were truly unvaccinated so he doesn’t even know the claim he is making. Regardless if the AV crowd actually knew the details of what they were copying and pasting information about they would realize their entire side of the argument is completely hypocritical and ironic and for a thousand different reasons. Bottom line and something that Jason will never respond to is vaccines are safe and vaccines do work. Studies have shown those things again and again and again.
You showed a meta-analysis regarding the MMR vaccine only, that EXCLUDED vaccine damaged children. Why do you think they removed vaccine damaged children from the study? Does it make sense that they are trying to find a link between autism and vaccination but excluded autistic children who were vaccine damaged. Sigh, you keep vaccinating.
I wonder what people would say if they knew that Jenner’s first smallpox vaccination was an injection of COW PUS. Here is the recipe for an early rabies vaccination (The Poisoned Needle – 1957): “In 1806 a Mr. Kraus was awarded $1000, by the then rulers of New York territory for his scientific discovery which had kept rabies out of New York for over twenty years. His formula is a matter of record and consisted of the ground-up jaw bone of an ass or dog, a piece of colt’s tongue and the green rust off a penny of George the First reign.”
Now, for our MODERN vaccines, we’ve swapped cow pus for cow “serum”, we’ve replaced the jawbone with mice brains, the colt’s tongue with monkey kidneys, and the green rust with aluminum, mercury, and acetone (paint thinner). They’ve attached some fancy words to them, like “fibroblasts,” “AS04” and “MPL,” but it’s all basically the same when one learns the translation of those terms.
The history of vaccinations and epidemics has been re-written by the corporations, whose power has also enabled them to manipulate the U.S. government to absolve them of all liability for the deaths and damages caused by their 18th century formulas, and place all the financial burden on us, the taxpayers.
Here’s a challenge that was put forth on another site by someone else. I think it’s a good one, in response to the first line in quotes: “higher number would suffer worse consequences without them were childhood diseases allowed to return.”
If you think this is the case please provide the following:
-Independent double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
– Independent scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
-Independent scientific evidence which can prove that disease reduction in any part of the world, at any point in history was attributable to inoculation of populations?
-Independent scientific justification as to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health and prevents disease?
-a risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human health for the intended goal of preventing disease?
-Independent scientific justification on how bypassing the respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream enhances immune functioning and prevents future infections?-Independent scientific justification on how a vaccine would prevent viruses from mutating?
-Independent scientific justification as to how a vaccination can target a virus in an infected individual who does not have the exact viral configuration or strain the vaccine was developed for?
Independent means NO medical industrial complex involvement. To determine this you must research the researchers to ascertain what their academic credentials are & where, past & current employment ties to either Pharma or any university/hospital/research group. Of course top of the list is who is the funding source for the studies.
Don’t ban Sigh! It’s much more entertaining watching him squirm.
Oh, no – please ban trolls like Sigh who are Simply Blind (or may be paid by the industry) and who pretend to be intellectual when you, Jason, have done an AMAZING job not only writing this article, but providing links and evidence and salient thought processes. My oldest son was vaccine injured and that was enough for me. Permanently. My second child is now married and has an unvaccinated son, and we couldn’t be more proud. And he is, of course, a very healthy kid.
I SO APPRECIATE you defending your position in the response column. You are a hero.
Sigh can read (and misinterpret) any studies he wants….but the MUCH larger point is the countless vaccine injured and vaccine deaths that have occurred because of the lies from Big Pharma, and their shills like Sigh. If Sigh wants to poison his kids….well, I think that’s deserving of jail time. That aside, mandatory vaccination will NEVER work. Sigh, come on board to the safe vaccine side. You’ll sleep better.
Ban me because I am linking studies and countering the poorly thought out claims Jason has made? Would be fitting, silence the other side without actually reading or comprehending any of the information right? I wonder AJ, did you take ANY time to actually read what I said and the studies I linked? Or did you just, like George and others here, resort to name calling and claim that I am being “paid”? I know you won’t answer my questions and will refuse to actually look at the claims I made and the data that backs them up. I also know that you came, like many AV and read Jason’s incorrect claims without any knowledge of the subjects and agreed because that is what you WANT to hear, not because you have read the information and articles and made an informed decision. I am sorry you child was injured, but taking the easy way out and blaming vaccines and then joining a movement backed only by unsubstantiated questions and claims will not save future children like your oldest son. Getting to the root cause of injuries and afflictions like autism are the only way to move forward.
I am highly censoring Sigh because he’s aggressive and insulting. I understand his frustration though, as he did point out a flaw with my article, which I will address here.
These are two the studies he has listed in some of his rebuttals. Please let me know if I missed any and I will address them. This one http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2275444 and http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa021134#t=articleResults both of which were reported to show that vaccinated children were studied compared to unvaccianted. There’s one problem, the unvaccinated groups, the groups claimed to have not been vaccinated, have only not been vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. What about the 9 other vaccines a child is often given before the age of 1? Of course that information is left out of the short summaries of each study. This is exactly what the vaccine debate is all about.
Can we ever get a study that compares people who are vaccinated compared to people who have never been vaccianted? Of course not and the reasons for that are obvious. People like Sigh, and there are many like him, thrive off these studies because they are reported like everything is great and that if you get vaccinated or not, oddly enough some people who get the vaccine or not are brain damaged or hurt. But again why do we believe there’s so much effort placed forward to avoiding doing vaccinated vs unvaccinated studies? Why is a study allowed to call a group of people “unvaccinated”, when either they’re 1) vaccinated or 2) that information is left out of the study. Look at these studies? Do they look complex? Of course they do. Are we to really believe that the people conducting these studies either a) don’t know if the people involved have taken other vaccines, other than the MMR or 2) can’t see the flawed science in calling someone unvaccinated when they’ve been vaccinated?
As for Sigh pointing out a flaw in my article regarding this study http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823, it does show vaccine failure but doesn’t prove that people with antibodies get sick. That was indeed a mistake on my part. I have revamped the article and added a better example of the point I was trying to make regarding the false assumption that antibodies equal increased immunity or resistance to disease. http://www.whale.to/vaccines/antibody.html
Sign will tell you that because I made a mistake in my article that all my information is not valid and that we must keep vaccinating. It’s up to the readers to decide that.
Thank you Jason for this detailed article I have saved this!
I have been following you for a while now and you have helped me make such positive changes in my life and made my decision clear as crystal about not vaccinating my children when I have them!
Love and Light!
My son started having whooping cough since he was 2 months old. He got the Tdap vaccination at 2 months old. It seems like the vaccination make him sick. He’s had whooping cough his whole life asthma and croup. He is fourteen now it has allergies throat closes and up he’s always sick. Also when he was 1 he hit his head and they found a cyst in his brain. The shots could have caused that also. I just had a baby girl and I declined to have the hep B shot when she was born. She will never have a shot in her life even if it prevents her from going to school. That doesn’t make sense to vaccinate my daughter because my son got the Tdap to prevent whooping cough and he’s got it bad all the time.
Jason, polio wasn’t renamed. Once widespread vaccination began the more stringent diagnostic criteria used in the Salk vaccine trials were adopted. What do you think polio is called now, if not polio? And why are Pakistan and Afghanistan the only 2 countries left with endemic polio?
And how do you think smallpox was eradicated if not through vaccines?
Thanks!
Bill – you are not reading the article, which included 1) the names polio have been reclassified under 2) the medical association admitting to renaming polio and 3) the most popular name of polio today which is Guillian Barre.
Of course Bill it’s going to appear that polio exists only in other countries because it’s renamed but what do you think all construction in Canada today has to include wheel chair ramps, wheel chair elevators and handicapped washrooms. Who do you think are using all those?
Here in this video regarding vaccine failure and vaccine induced death/injury we have a women paralyzed in a wheel chair. She was told she has Guillian Barre, which is polio. Same internal and external symptoms different name. Guillian Barre is a common side effect of most vaccines today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8elE7Ct1jWw
You don’t mention polio in the article unless I missed it.Which paragraph was that? I was responding to a comment you made 5/23/2016. So it’s your belief that Guillain Barre syndrome is really polio? Both can cause paralysis, but GBS is also called ascending paralysis because it starts in the lower extremities and works its way up, which is not typical of polio. Polio is diagnosed with DNA testing of stool samples, while GBS is really a clinical diagnosis.
And what happened to smallpox?
Bill how many books on this subject do you have in your personal library? Now I know you most likely don’t have any and that’s not to take a jab at your intelligence but what I am saying is that there is more information beyond what you’ve been told. You are arguing these points like you know them for sure, simply repeating to me what everyone was told about polio etc. So we as a society, continue to tell others, exactly what we’ve been told………but we don’t have any books on these subjects in our own libraries.
The strength of the system we’re ruled with is based on our concrete insistence that the people who rule over us would never lie to us, although they continually tell us that poison is healthy to inject into ourselves and stick in our mouths but no one who does that is healthy. It’s first about seeing that this is contradictory to basic logic and then it’s about investigating. If all you are going to say is basically “I can’t believe what I know isn’t true” then we’re at a dead lock but if you really want to know what’s going on you can investigate these two links.
One is a PhD scientist reviewing for you that vaccines have not reduced or eradicated disease, as you have been told. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtN0PMJOOjMhttps://www.facebook.com/jason.christoff.12/posts/10207534357929436?fref=nf
The other is an article that contains interesting links about polio. https://www.facebook.com/jason.christoff.12/posts/10207534357929436?fref=nf
Jason, I’ve actually treated GBS patients with plasmapheresis. We’re typically asked to do that in an ICU setting when their diaphragms start to be affected and they can’t breathe well. I typically order a 1 plasma volume exchange daily for 5 days. We’ve always seen a dramatic improvement. Are you still going to claim it’s a polio infection?
Bill read some info other than what you’re told was true. If you keep thinking that the people who pay you to administer poison to people told you the truth about health, I can’t help you.
Bill Pembry – Please read this:
Dissolving Illusions by Suzanne Humphries & Roman …
http://www.westonaprice.org/book-reviews/dissolving-illusions-by-suzanne...
Jason, I’m curious which books about vaccines you have at home. Which would you consider your 5 best?
I absolutely love this article and your logic, please don’t stop.
Fantastic article! I’m a medical doctor and a mum! Completely agree with all that you say, have researched and written….so thank you for taking the time to do so. The thing that confuses me a lot is why pro-vaxers insist on calling anti-vaxers “quacks”, “nutjobs” etc… I’ve even been accused of child abuse my colleagues….. What do they (pro) think we’re gaining by actually doing some research… Anti-vaxxers tend to know MORE about baccines than pro…. Most of us were probably always PRO until we saw the light!! Keep up the good work!
Really? I doubt that. Surely if you were a real physician you would have learned what real research is and how to do it in med school. Did they not teach you about study design and hierarchy of evidence? Seriously???
This is a real medical school trained physician who explains he was lied to about vaccines in medical school but please ignore that. We all know you will ignore it and what he says. No need to respond. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LB-3xkeDAE
I normally try not to respond to these type of articles but the only reason I am commenting is because of the section where you compared autism to brain damage. This is not only offensive to me, a behavior analyst who has worked with children and adults with autism for over 15 years, but also to the autism community. Yes, autism is a neurological disorder, but it is in no way a form brain damage! Yes, their brain works differently, but that doesn’t mean their brain is broken or damaged. Some of the smartest and most successful people in the world have a form of autism. And the whole vaccines cause autism debate, I could go into the numerous scientific studies that have disproven this over and over…but I don’t have to, we all know this. My experience also supports this as I have worked with many students who have at least one other family member on the spectrum (siblings with autism, parents on the autism spectrum who have children with autism, etc). In my opinion, this supports the fact that there is a genetic component. Additionally, I have also worked with quite a few children with autism who were NOT vaccinated. I actually had two brothers that I worked with recently, both on the autism spectrum, both not vaccinated. Oh, and I will also mention that their mother was also on the autism spectrum. Again, I know there are different views on vaccinations and normally I would keep my views to myself, but your comments show how uneducated you are I feel it is my job to defend my students who have autism, not brain damage.
Laura – Dr. Russell Blaylock, a board certified neurosurgeon explains that Autism is brain damage and draws that out in scientific detail regarding how vaccines cause this brain damage. As for people who aren’t vaccinated having Autism, you are only proving my point that Autism is brain damage. No one ever claimed you could only get brain damage from vaccines. There are many ways to inflict brain damage on children, vaccines being the most frequent in our child abuse based society. No child has a gene that makes them impervious to the toxins in vaccines. There’s no genetic component like this, as doctor Blaylock explains. Each vaccine damages the brain and neurological system of each child, but it takes 70% damage in one area of the brain for the damage to be obvious to a parent or caregiver. The damage a vaccine does is dependent on the health of the child when exposed to the brain damaging event or compound. The less nutritionally robust the child, the greater the damage and the damage will be noticed when the 70% brain damage level is attained. Again, this board certified brain surgeon not only declares you are incorrect, he proves it conclusively with the best video presentation of it’s kind ever recorded for the public. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYV8laCbNSE
Your response here is a bit of a red flag for me. You mention Dr. Blaylock as a board certified neurosurgeon as if that means his word is gospel on the subject of vaccines and autism. I’ve watched the video you linked and there isn’t really anything beyond the word of this man. A lot of techno babble designed to sound complicated and credible to people without an in depth knowledge of medical science.
I did some digging and found that this man has his own line of expensive supplements and detoxes that claim to fix the very problems he lectures about. It sounds like a lot of fear mongering to drive sales of his product. It makes for a nice retirement income considering this man does not see patients in a clinical setting.
The reason why this is a red flag is because this man does not appear to be credible and you seem to be placing a disproportionate amount of weight on his word because he is a doctor and it agrees with your preconceived ideas about vaccines while ignoring every single other board certified neurosurgeon that completely disagrees with Dr. Blaylock.
You talk about leaving the cult while quoting the unsubstantiated word of one man based on an appeal to authority. It’s a bit hypocritical and lacks a basic level of critical thinking on your part.
For the record I like a lot of what you write about self sabotage, sedation and trauma. Also, I follow a lot of what you regarding nutrition. We don’t have to agree on everything and hope we can discuss this openly like mature advanced thinkers.
Cheers!
Here are 60 plus other doctors and PhD scientists who testify to the extreme dangers of vaccines. So if you don’t like Dr. Blaylock you can pick from others. Your doctor’s main income is from vaccination so I am not sure where the idea that making money discredits a doctor. Your doctor also makes money if you are sick, not healthy. I am not sure if you are aware of these contradiction with your debate. There are hundreds of doctors who speak the truth about vaccines, with no benefit to themselves of course. There’s also no need to take the word of any medical doctor as the vaccine insert itself declares all vaccines can kill or cripple the vaccine recipient and that the vaccine maker won’t guarantee immunity after injection. I would have to believe you did not explore all linked content in this article before you made the comment because this list of medical doctors is included in the article. Doctors declare vaccines are unhealthy and the vaccine makers do as well. Not too sure what else someone needs. It’s about pattern recognition and the strength to make up one’s own mind, based on the evidence, and not peer pressure or a job with the government, who punishes people who talk against the poisoning. If someone works in the poisoning medical field, such arguments are designed to protect self.
In The Age of Information,….Ignorance is a Choice
Medical doctors and PhD scientists who explain clearly why vaccines are not safe or effective. 4.0
1. Dr. Nancy Banks – http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm
2. Dr. Russell Blaylock – http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL
3. Dr. Shiv Chopra – http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s
4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx
5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries – http://bit.ly/17sKDbf
6. Dr. Larry Palevsky – http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6
7. Dr. Toni Bark – http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield – http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo
9. Dr. Meryl Nass – http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc
10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin – http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl
11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot – http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL
12. Dr. Robert Rowen – http://bit.ly/1SIELeF
13. Dr. David Ayoub – http://bit.ly/1SIELve
14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD – http://bit.ly/1KsdVby
15. Dr. Rashid Buttar – http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6
16. Dr. Roby Mitchell – http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU
17. Dr. Ken Stoller – http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI
18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein – http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH
19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD – http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI
20. Dr. David Davis – http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo
21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych – http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J
22. Dr. Harold E Buttram – http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df
23. Dr. Kelly Brogan – http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ
24. Dr. RC Tent – http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu
25. Dr. Rebecca Carley – http://bit.ly/K49F4d
26. Dr. Andrew Moulden – http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu
27. Dr. Jack Wolfson – http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA
28. Dr. Michael Elice – http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA
29. Dr. Terry Wahls – http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd
30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff – http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY
31. Dr. Paul Thomas – http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf
32. Many doctors talking at once – http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv
33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz – http://bit.ly/1OtWG7D
34. Dr. Jane Orient – http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb
35. Dr. Richard Deth – http://bit.ly/1GQDL10
36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic – http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5
37. Dr Chris Shaw – http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp
38. Dr. Susan McCreadie – http://bit.ly/1CqqN83
39. Dr. Mary Ann Block – http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX
40. Dr. David Brownstein – http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A
41. Dr. Jayne Donegan – http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz
42. Dr. Troy Ross – http://bit.ly/1IlGlNH
43. Dr. Philip Incao – http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS
44. Dr. Joseph Mercola – http://bit.ly/18dE38I
45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet – http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC
46. Dr. Robert Mendelson – http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr
47. Dr. Garth Nicolson – http://bit.ly/1OQVJsF
48. Dr. Marc Girard – http://bit.ly/1iw0smT
49. Dr. Charles Richet – http://bit.ly/1G5GG7j
50. Dr. Zac Bush – http://bit.ly/1LS19OZ
51. Dr. Lawrence Wilson – http://bit.ly/1kcdirf
52. Dr. James Howenstine – http://bit.ly/1iNyFOy
53. Dr Burton A. Waisbren, Sr., M.D. – http://bit.ly/1Nj8LRe
54. Dr. Sam Eggertsen – http://bit.ly/1Mww9XV
55. Dr. Bonnie Dunbar – http://bit.ly/1N5DXNi
56. Dr. Judy Mikovits – http://bit.ly/1QIzmHU
57. Dr. John Bergan – http://bit.ly/1KYv1yY
58. Dr. Rima E. Laibow – bit.ly/1RmW73C
59. Dr. Lee Hieb – http://bit.ly/1VElDUv
60. Dr. Daniel Kalb – http://bit.ly/22FPmxv
61. Dr. Rachel Ross – http://bit.ly/1r7Doik
Many more doctors testifying that vaccines aren’t safe or effective, in these documentaries….
1. Vaccination – The Silent Epidemic – http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W
2. The Greater Good – http://bit.ly/1icxh8j
3. Shots In The Dark – http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h
4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth – http://bit.ly/KEYDUh
5. Vaccine Nation – http://bit.ly/1iKNvpU
6. Vaccination – The Truth About Vaccines – http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU
7. Lethal Injection – http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ
8. Bought – http://bit.ly/1M7YSlr
9. Deadly Immunity – http://bit.ly/1KUg64Z
10. Autism – Made in the USA – http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5
11. Beyond Treason – http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt
12. Trace Amounts – http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv
13. Why We Don’t Vaccinate – http://bit.ly/1KbXhuf
14. Autism Yesterday – http://bit.ly/1URU2A7
15. Denmark Documentary on HPV Vaccine – http://bit.ly/1AJI0dx
16. Vaxxed – bit.ly/1qackPC
17. Man Made Epidemic – http://bit.ly/1XsOi0R
18. 50 Cents A Dose – http://bit.ly/2c0h07P
Joe Kapa
What are your exact credentials for you to be able to make these claims ? What university credentials do you have ?
Joe would it really matter. If I told you I was a medical doctor, would you change your mind?
Jason, thank you for your speaking up. As I write this, I feel a great deal of frustration. Vaccines were injected in me, against my own will, and today I suffer from autoimmune diseases that are ruining my life. Once I started learning the truth about vaccines I had to face the reality that I allowed my children to be harmed as well. Parents, if they really care, will start listening and I am thankful that you are one more voice to get the truth heard. My eldest 6 had vaccines but my youngest baby girl is 100% vaccine free. Thankfully I started to really look for what doctors won’t tell you.
When your children start dying from preventable diseases then the guilt will lie at your anti-vaxxer feet. There is a reason people don’t get polio and other diseases that used to ravage children. It’s because of vaccines which not only prevent the disease but practically wiped it out. I have to vaccinate my kids to make sure they don’t get sick from your unvaccinated kids. While your kids die, mine will live.
Put a picture of your kids up for everyone to see Tom and I will place a picture of my kids up. I will also place myself and my wife up and you can do the same. The proof of health is in your physical body. I guarantee you that you will not live longer than myself and your children as well, compared to mine. I also know, as a fact, your health before you even place up your pictures. Just share with us your facebook page so we can see for ourselves this amazing health that comes about from following the herd, taking orders like a slave, having a passionate love affair with science and injecting the poison. You are scared to look in the mirror and you want the society to be like you, so you don’t have to explore your insanity of injecting poisons into your own child (and yourself) and believing you’re a good parent. You don’t want to change, so you want everyone else to change, so you never have to. We know people like yourself, so insane and so scared, that you just have to be right because to admit you are wrong, is too much to take, in a society where you have no control over everything but your inverted beliefs. So go ahead, prove us all wrong. Give us your facebook page or a place where we can see yourself and your kids. Don’t worry as well, we already know your response because you won’t do any of that because it’s just easier for you to look outside for the insanity, instead of inside. We await your illogical and irrational response of attack, avoiding the reality, which is the very pattern of your entire being.
Of all the untrue things in your article I think the most blatant is that the United States has the highest infant mortality rate in the world. Surely you must admit that is false. Not even close. Not only is it no where near the highest it is lower than it has ever been. It is half what it was in 1990.
Yes those statistics are unproven…..or are they? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/29/our-infant-mortality-rate-is-a-national-embarrassment/?utm_term=.c9f1ea4a501c
I am in agreement with the choice to not vaccinate EXCEPT—WHAT ABOUT TETANUS!??? Honestly-this is the ONE issue that has honestly kept me awake thinking about (My unvaccinated loved one)…It is rare but thereare about 50 cases in the US yearly and almost entirely preventable with the vaccine! and I hate the thought of the TIG
None of the vaccines are proven to do anything advertised, including tetanus. Tet is head in French and anus is anus. Nothing is hidden. They inject the poison and mock you openly. Nothing works the way you think it does.
I really enjoyed your article. I’m skeptical of vaccines and this article was shared with me. I wanted to ask if your kids ever got sick with any of
The diseases the vaccines supposedly immunize against? If so, how did their immune system handle It. I have three kids and my youngest has only received his 2 month shots (he’s 4 months now) and I’m trying to decide if I should do a
Delayed/selective schedule or just quit vaccines altogether. Thank you!
No vaccines and never sick. Poison can’t make anyone better or healthier. Poison doesn’t work like that. The people who administer and invent your vaccines, don’t vaccinate their kids.
Very good writen and strong arguments! But did you nake any reaserch in Europe? The most common sentence I heard “you travel often with your baby, so you need to vaccinate her, because of that…” Do you have any answer on that? 🙂 thx
For all the people that are for vaccinating, I have a question. Lets pretend vaccines did what they said they did. Is giving your infant a cocktail of harmful chemicals worth possibly preventing them from getting a tolerable, hardly deadly childhood illness that you get, youre sick for a week with a slight fever and then it goes away and your immune forever?
If vaccines are so safe, why are they the most guarded and scary thing in the world. You can literally die from a single shot given. You might think the chances of that are miniscule, but why are do you have to sign waivers, or why is the government set up to handle lawsuits, why does each insert have to warn you about possible crippling side effect, including death? and you’ve all know vaccine damaged kids exist, regardless of numbers. you KNOW vaccines can do irreparable. damage or even kill. But risking that is worth your kid not getting the measles. I see post after post of people saying they would feel horrible if their kid died from a “disease” that could have been prevented, but imagine the opposite. Imagine turning your perfectly healthy kid into a potato all for the sake of pharmaceutical companies lining their pockets.
1. They do what “they claim”. Each vaccine has a different efficacy profile. Some have a higher efficacy than others. But none are ineffective.
2. There are no ‘harmful chemicals” in any vaccine. And yes, I’ve checked.
3. Encephalitis, deafness, permanent mental disability, death, liver cancer, cervical cancer, loss of limbs, are not “tolerable”
4. “Most guarded and scary thing in the world”. What? Says who???
5. Everything in the US comes with disclaimers. When I have dental work I have to sign a waiver and yes, death is always listed to cover their butt. Thats whether youre getting a tooth pulled or taking a simple aspirin. It’s also a risk if you eat a peanut or cracker. In face, peanuts have a HIGHER chance of killing than all the other things put together.
6. Fact: serious reactions to vaccines are incredibly rare. Less than one in a million.
7. Fact: without the vaccines millions more children would be dying EVERY SINGLE YEAR.
So mercury and aluminum are safe? Come on Misty, don’t waste our time, with you reading straight from the corrupt media with your regurgitation. You’re repeating what you were told. That’s not knowledge. That’s indoctrination based slavery.
I tried to click on your link above of “ long list of medical doctors and scientists” but it looks like it’s been derailed and there is no link? I think it’s been blocked by Google and Facebook? Do you have those links to your long list of medical doctors and scientists that have proven the unsafety of vaccines? I am trying to gather my long list of proof as to why I choose not to vaccinate and hopefully spreading the word to others. ??