Fluoride and Your Health  (Part II)

In the last article I reviewed some points regarding fluoride. First I tabled the idea that both sides involved in the fluoride issue are well aware and admit openly that fluoride is toxic to optimal cellular function of living organisms. That means, there can be no logical argument made that fluoride is not a poison or toxin.

The idea of fluoride being a toxin is the sole reason why the dose of fluoride is so heavily restricted, measured and regulated. What happens when the fluoride dose goes above standardized levels in a city’s water supply? Well, unfortunately many water treatment plants have failed to maintain standardized fluoride levels and the resulting effect on the people’s health hasn’t been good. Failures such as these are recorded in Dr. Russell Blaylock’s book, “Health and Nutrition Secrets: That Can Save Your Life”. When fluoride comes into the water supply at concentrations above standardized levels, people get sick.

How do we know that Cornwall’s fluoride measuring technology is failure proof? Is any technology failure proof? So not only is fluoride a toxin, there have been recorded cases of excessive fluoride being mistakenly released into the water supplies and this has made people sick. What is sickness? Sickness is a malfunction of the body based on a breakdown in cellular function? Fluoride causes just such a breakdown and at any dose. When you consume fluoride, cells somewhere in your body are dying or malfunctioning because of it. (even though you can’t feel or see it) When did the definition of health come to include cellular death or dysfunction?

I also have personal memories of attending Glen Walter Public School and our teacher giving us fluoride to swish in our mouths once per week. A warning was repeated loud and clear, which was never to swallow it. Many children including myself became ill after the fluoride treatments and now I know why. So again, fluoride is a toxin. Plain and simple. So why are we placing fluoride in the water supply again?

The fluoride debate starts at a certain line in the sand where a small group of scientists attempt to tell much larger groups of people that although a large dose of fluoride can actually end your life, a small dose of the toxin benefits you. Is this true? Does it even sound logical on the surface? Why is science so obsessed with poison in the first place?

Why are a small group of scientists even permitted to tell a much larger group of people that because science believes a poison is good for us that we need to keep placing it in the water supply? What track record does science hold in regards to its’ foundational belief that toxins are what we all need to live better lives anyway? Does being told what to do sound democratic or is there something else going on? Why are we the citizens not permitted to vote on important issues such as these? As citizens we do count on our elected officials to decide certain things for us but doesn’t it appear that our elected officials have out sourced the fluoride decision to a couple of scientists? Was the entire population fairly represented? Or is that the point? Are we being slowly conditioned that science will rule over us, that poison is good for us and to pay taxes toward the very structure that’s destroying the functionality of our society?

Just some questions to think about. As promised in the last article I was going to table a simple test that any human can apply, to any situation, in order to know if what they’re hearing is true or not. There are always two sides to every story, so what side is really true? Well, the real truth will always provide positive societal benefit for all. I will apply that simple test to fluoride in the next article and we’ll see if fluoride and its’ claims carry real truth or are we all being led down the primrose path?