I explained that an antibody test, the RT-PCR machine and an antigen test……all don’t test directly for COVID. That’s correct, none of the tests for COVID actually test for the virus directly, just evidence of its existence. Sort of like coming to a house after a robbery. You didn’t get the robber themselves but the evidence is there that a robbery has already taken place. The person I’m talking about responded “well a pregnancy test doesn’t actually test directly for the baby either, just evidence of the baby……so all the COVID tests are exactly like that. So there’s nothing wrong here and we need to follow the science.”.

I replied “you’re exactly correct, the big difference is that with a pregnancy test you can actually measure the accuracy of the pregnancy test you’re using by comparing the test results with the women you’re testing. Eventually it becomes obvious if the women are actually pregnant or not and that’s called the gold standard in science: The gold standard in science is when you compare the accuracy of the test your using to a concrete result, which can’t be denied. None of the COVID testing protocols have been compared to the gold standard, which means the results of these tests have never been compared to sick or healthy people. If a test says “you’re sick” and you’re perfectly healthy, under normal circumstances (if that happens in any significant quantity) no one is permitted to use that test on the public. So yes my friend, there’s plenty wrong here because most people testing positive for COVID aren’t sick and have no symptoms of disease. The media is calling these people asymptomatic, which is just a fancy word that means “not sick” and this in turn means the test should never be used in the first place. None of those tests are accurate and the results are being used to destroy the public where they stand…….so pretty big deal and yes plenty wrong with what’s going on.”